The world has gone mad in this COVID era we are living in today.
The media has drummed so much paranoia over COVID that people actually believe that if they catch the virus it equals a death sentence. That is not the part of the media to scare people into receiving a vaccine based purely on fear and not informed consent.
However, it will only get worse now that the tyrants have found a way to make the population willfully hand over their rights for just a small sense of security.
We have seen politicians become drunk with power using this experimental jab as a way to ruin people’s lives.
Though, we have not seen anything as horrible as one Cook County judge just committed during this entire farce of a pandemic.
In a move that should turn your blood cold, this particular judge set a precedent that sadly we could see sweep the nation by stripping a mother’s rights over not vaccinating against COVID.
Though what makes it even more disturbing is that the father of the child and his lawyer agree with the decision.
How can anyone support the stripping of parental rights? How can anyone be ok with this?
Yes, the father and mother are gripped in a brutal custody battle but that does not mean that this should be used as a way to beat your spouse.
If that is not abusive, I don’t know what is.
FOX 32 Chicago reported:
In what all parties agree is a very unusual and perhaps unprecedented step, a judge at Chicago’s Daley Center has stripped Rebecca Firlit of custody because she refuses to get a vaccination shot.
“I miss my son more than anything. It’s been very difficult. I haven’t seen him since August 10th,” Firlit told FOX 32 News in an exclusive interview.
That’s the day Firlit appeared in court via Zoom along with her ex-husband for a child support hearing involving their 11-year-old son. The two have been divorced for seven years and share custody and parenting time.
She says out of the blue, Cook County Judge James Shapiro asked her whether she had been vaccinated. Firlit told Shapiro she had not because she has had bad reactions to vaccines in the past.
Shapiro then ordered that Firlit be stripped of all parenting time with her son until she gets vaccinated.
Over the past two weeks, Firlit has been able to talk to her son on the phone and through video calls, but has not seen him in person.
“I think that it’s wrong. I think that it’s dividing families. And I think it’s not in my son’s best interest to be away from his mother,” Firlit said.
Firlit is now appealing the court order, saying the judge has no business taking away her parenting rights simply because she’s not vaccinated.
“It had nothing to do with what we were talking about. He was placing his views on me. And taking my son away from me,” Firlit said.
Annette Fernholz, Firlit’s attorney, says the judge has overstepped his authority.
“In this case you have a judge, without any matter before him regarding the parenting time with the child deciding ‘Oh, you’re not vaccinated. You don’t get to see your child until you are vaccinated.’ That kind of exceeds his jurisdiction,” Fernholz said.
“You have to understand the father did not even bring this issue before the court. So it’s the judge on his own and making this decision that you can’t see your child until you’re vaccinated,” Fernholz added.
The attorney representing the father, Jeffrey Leving, says they were also surprised by the judge’s decision, but they support the ruling saying that given the pandemic, the child should be protected from an unvaccinated mother.